[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061020081857.743b5eb7@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:18:57 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
> Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:15:43 -0700
>
> > The original skb management for netpoll was a mess, it had two queue paths
> > and a callback. This changes it to have a per-instance transmit queue
> > and use a tasklet rather than a work queue for the congested case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
>
> I think you mis-diffed this one:
>
> - WARN_ON(skb->protocol == 0);
>
> That line doesn't exist in my copy of net/core/netpoll.c
> even with your first patch applied.
>
> Also, you forgot to remove the ->drop callback pointer
> from struct netpoll, which you should do if it really
> isn't used any more.
>
> I think you might run into problems there, as I believe the netdump
> stuff does make non-trivial use of the ->drop callback. Indeed, it
> uses the ->dump callback for invoking a special
> netpoll_start_netdump() function. I'm pretty sure ->dump was created
> specifically to accomodate netdump.
>
Netdump is not in the tree, so I can't fix it. Also netdump is pretty
much superseded by kdump.
> So this is something else which will need to be worked out before we
> can apply this patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists