[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4538ECCD.4020005@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:35:41 -0500
From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] KVM: userspace interface
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>>
>>> writel(dst_x_reg, x);
>>> writel(dst_y_reg, y)
>>> writel(width_reg, w);
>>> writel(height_reg, h);
>>> writel(blt_cmd_reg, fill);
>>>
>>> then kvm would cache the first four in a mmap()able memory area and
>>> only exit to userspace on the fifth. Userspace would then read the
>>> cached registers from memory and emulate the command.
>>
>> Letting QEMU do a certain amount of emulation after every transition
>> would the problem in a more elegant and generic way.
>>
>
> But what amount? A basic block, or several?
>
> Emulation has its costs. You need to marshal the registers to and
> fro. You need to reset qemu's cached translations. You need to throw
> away shadow page tables and qemu's softmmu. You increase the time
> spent in single threaded code.
Admittedly still a research topic. If you're interested in what we're
doing in Xen, check out:
http://xenbits.xensource.com/ext/xen-unstable-hvm.hg (sorry, xenbits is
down right now but hopefully it will be fixed quickly).
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists