[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200610201854.43893.m.kozlowski@tuxland.pl>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 18:54:43 +0200
From: Mariusz Kozlowski <m.kozlowski@...land.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.19-rc2-mm2
Hello,
> Don't know. Nothing has changed in the git-pcmcia tree since July.
>
> Are you able to bisect it, as per
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/bisecting-mm-trees.txt ?
>
> > When running without debug options enabled also these were seen amongst
> > dmesg lines:
> >
> > [drm:radeon_cp_init] *ERROR* radeon_cp_init called without lock held
> > [drm:drm_unlock] *ERROR* Process 5131 using kernel context 0
>
> <googles>
>
> This? http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/9/10/78
I think I found the culprit. It's CONFIG_PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE option. It is
actually marked as EXPERIMENTAL and there is even a proper warning included
on the help page. Disabling it makes the kernel behave the right way. So
should what I reported be considered a real error or not? Then the next
question is should I report errors caused by options marked as EXPERIMENTAL
or just leave it the way it is until the option is not EXPERIMENTAL anymore?
>> This time it _is_ -mm ;-)
>>
>Well... that's what it's for ;) Thanks for testing.
No problem. Thanks for Linux.
Regards,
Mariusz Kozlowski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists