linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061020122527.56292b56@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>
Date:	Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue

On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:24:27 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 08:18:57 -0700
> 
> > Netdump is not in the tree, so I can't fix it. Also netdump is pretty
> > much superseded by kdump.
> 
> Unless kdump is %100 ready you can be sure vendors will ship netdump
> for a little while longer.  I think gratuitously breaking netdump is
> not the best idea.
> 
> It's not like netdump is some binary blob you can't get the source
> to easily. :-)
> 

Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor code any differently
than out-of-tree other code.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/