[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061020.125226.59656580.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:52:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...l.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 12:25:27 -0700
> Sorry, but why should we treat out-of-tree vendor code any
> differently than out-of-tree other code.
I think what netdump was trying to do, provide a way to
requeue instead of fully drop the SKB, is quite reasonable.
Don't you think?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists