[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061019.200211.88476455.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 20:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: zyf.zeroos@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: about flush TLB during unmapping a page in memory
subsystem
From: "yunfeng zhang" <zyf.zeroos@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:47:49 +0800
> In rmap.c::try_to_unmap_one of 2.6.16.29, there are some code snippets
>
> .....
> /* Nuke the page table entry. */
> flush_cache_page(vma, address, page_to_pfn(page));
> pteval = ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pte);
> // >>> The above line is expanded as below
> // >>> pte_t __pte;
> // >>> __pte = ptep_get_and_clear((__vma)->vm_mm, __address, __ptep);
> // >>> flush_tlb_page(__vma, __address);
> // >>> __pte;
>
> /* Move the dirty bit to the physical page now the pte is gone. */
> if (pte_dirty(pteval))
> set_page_dirty(page);
> .....
>
>
> It seems that they only can work on UP system.
>
> On SMP, let's suppose the pte was clean, after A CPU executed
> ptep_get_and_clear,
> B CPU makes the pte dirty, which will make a fatal error to A CPU since it gets
> a stale pte, isn't right?
B can't make it dirty because it's been cleared to zero
and flush_tlb_page() has removed the TLB cached copy of
the PTE. B can therefore only see the new cleared PTE.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists