[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061020.001530.35664340.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 00:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: shemminger@...l.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] netpoll: rework skb transmit queue
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:15:43 -0700
> The original skb management for netpoll was a mess, it had two queue paths
> and a callback. This changes it to have a per-instance transmit queue
> and use a tasklet rather than a work queue for the congested case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
I think you mis-diffed this one:
- WARN_ON(skb->protocol == 0);
That line doesn't exist in my copy of net/core/netpoll.c
even with your first patch applied.
Also, you forgot to remove the ->drop callback pointer
from struct netpoll, which you should do if it really
isn't used any more.
I think you might run into problems there, as I believe the netdump
stuff does make non-trivial use of the ->drop callback. Indeed, it
uses the ->dump callback for invoking a special
netpoll_start_netdump() function. I'm pretty sure ->dump was created
specifically to accomodate netdump.
So this is something else which will need to be worked out before we
can apply this patch.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists