linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] Enforce "unsigned long flags;" when spinlocking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20061020173233.ad9fcda8.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:32:33 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Enforce "unsigned long flags;" when spinlocking

On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 03:38:03 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:

> > If we're going to do this then a helper macro build_check_irq_flags() would
> > help clean things up.  It will also allow us to centralise the
> > warning-vs-error policy decision.
> 
> I will find a common header. kernel.h probably.

irqflags.h sounds more appropriate.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/