[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <adabqo5lip8.fsf@cisco.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2006 09:47:15 -0700
From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
Cc: Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...eus.cx>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Git training wheels for the pimple faced maintainer
> Other git maintainers may have other hints about how they work. Anybody?
I use StGIT (http://www.procode.org/stgit/) to have sort of a hybrid
git/quilt workflow. My infiniband.git tree has the following main
branches (I also keep other topic branches around):
for-2.6.19
for-2.6.20
for-linus
for-mm
master
I use master to track Linus's tree. for-2.6.19 and for-2.6.20 are
StGIT branches that have patches queued up for 2.6.19 and 2.6.20
(duh). The advantages of StGIT are:
- I can do "stg pull" to do the equivalent of "git rebase" in a
slightly cleaner way.
- If I queue a patch and then someone later says "oops, that patch
needs this fix," I can go back and revise the patch easily. This
means I avoid cluttering the main kernel history with "change X"
followed by "fix for change X" followed by "update change X"
- StGIT works within git, so when it is time to send the changes to
Linus, I can just do "git merge blah for-linus for-2.6.19" and
then ask Linus to pull the for-linus branch.
- R.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists