| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1161469641.17061.18.camel@nigel.suspend2.net> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 08:27:21 +1000 From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...uxmail.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...l.org>, suspend2-devel <suspend2-devel@...ts.suspend2.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add include/linux/freezer.h and move definitions from sched.h Hi. On Sat, 2006-10-21 at 15:41 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, 21 October 2006 14:21, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > Move process freezing functions from include/linux/sched.h to freezer.h, > > Hm, I'd rather move them to suspend.h. Is there any reason for introducing > yet another header file? Suspend.h sounds reasonable. I picked freezer.h because I thought it made the purpose of the #include simple and crystal clear, and doesn't pull in other dependencies (my freezer.h depends on nothing else, where as suspend.h already depends on: #if defined(CONFIG_X86) || defined(CONFIG_FRV) || defined(CONFIG_PPC32) #include <asm/suspend.h> #endif #include <linux/swap.h> #include <linux/notifier.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/pm.h> That said, suspend.h isn't anything like sched.h itself :) Nigel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists