lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061021225052.9395013B62@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:50:52 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
To:	patches@...-64.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] [1/2] x86_64: Fix C3 timer test


There was a typo in the C3 latency test to decide of the TSC
should be used or not. It used the C2 latency threshold, not the
C3 one. Fix that.

This should fix the time on various dual core laptops.

Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>

---
 arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
+++ linux/arch/x86_64/kernel/time.c
@@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ __cpuinit int unsynchronized_tsc(void)
  	if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 		/* But TSC doesn't tick in C3 so don't use it there */
-		if (acpi_fadt.length > 0 && acpi_fadt.plvl3_lat < 100)
+		if (acpi_fadt.length > 0 && acpi_fadt.plvl3_lat < 1000)
 			return 1;
 #endif
  		return 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ