| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <200610210014.k9L0E3pr005019@laptop13.inf.utfsm.cl> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:14:03 -0300 From: "Horst H. von Brand" <vonbrand@....utfsm.cl> To: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> cc: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ux01.gwdg.de>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: fs/Kconfig question regarding CONFIG_BLOCK Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 17 2006, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > > >> Never mind, I see that some filesystems have 'depends on BLOCK' instead > > >> of being wrapped into if BLOCK. Not really consistent but whatever. > > > > > >Feel free to send in patches that make things more consistent. > > > > How would you like things? if BLOCK or depends on BLOCK? > > Well, if you can hide an entire block with if BLOCK, then that would be > preferred. Otherwise depends on BLOCK. > > > Does menuconfig/oldconfig/etc. parse the whole config structure faster > > it it done either way? > > I'd be surprised if if BLOCK wasn't faster over, say, 10 depends on > BLOCK. I'd be /very/ surprised if anybody even noticed... -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile Fax: +56 32 2797513 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists