lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440610220928vbbe1023t25be1df0943eb471@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Oct 2006 09:28:26 -0700
From:	yhlu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To:	"Muli Ben-Yehuda" <muli@...ibm.com>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Andi Kleen" <ak@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64: typo in __assign_irq_vector when updating pos for vector and offset

On 10/22/06, Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com> wrote:
> All of the tests I ran were with NR_CPUS=8. Shall I try NR_CPUS=4?

So per_cpu only can be used onlined cpus?

I wonder if you try NR_CPUS without the patch, you will get more strange result.

YH
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ