| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 22:27:45 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> Cc: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...uxmail.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> Subject: Re: Freezer.h updated patch. On Sunday, 22 October 2006 20:39, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 14:29:33 +0200 > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Sunday, 22 October 2006 14:14, Nigel Cunningham wrote: > > > Hi guys. > > > > > > I missed a couple of "#include <freezer.h>"s in yesterdays patch; > > > funnily enough the ones in kernel/power! Here's an updated version. > > > > > > Rafael, did you still think the freezer.h contents should go into > > > suspend.h? > > > > Yes. > > > > I think freezer.h is OK. One 84-line file which does one thing is nice. > There's little advantage to putting this code into suspend.h along with a > bunch of somewhat-unrelated stuff. All of this stuff has one thing in common: it is only used for suspend (to disk or to RAM) now. > And it expresses the point that the freezer could be used for things other > than suspend. Okay, then. Let's take the patch as is. -- You never change things by fighting the existing reality. R. Buckminster Fuller - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists