linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reuse vector for set_xxx_irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:15:15 +0200
From:	Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...ibm.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>
Cc:	Andi Kleen <ak@....de>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reuse vector for set_xxx_irq_affinity in phys flat mode

On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:02:44AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> in phys flat mode, when using set_xxx_irq_affinity to irq balance from
> one cpu to another,  _assign_irq_vector will get to increase last used
> vector and get new vector. this will use up the vector if enough
> set_xxx_irq_affintiy are called. and end with using same vector in
> different cpu for different irq. (that is not what we want, we only
> want to use same vector in different cpu for different irq when more
> than 0x240 irq needed). To keep it simple, the vector should be resued
> from one cpu to another instead of getting new vector.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@....com>

Should I give this a spin? with or without Eric's two patches?

Cheers,
Muli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/