[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cda58cb80610231015i4b59a571kaea5711ae1659f0d@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:15:07 +0200
From: "Franck Bui-Huu" <vagabon.xyz@...il.com>
To: "Miguel Ojeda" <maxextreme@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...l.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc1 full] drivers: add LCD support
On 10/23/06, Miguel Ojeda <maxextreme@...il.com> wrote:
> Yes, we are sure. AFAIK there is no need to lock when it is a fbdev.
> The older version were "alone" drivers: they needed to lock because
> they used fops and they exported functions.
>
ok, so no other driver than fb could use 'cfag12864b_buffer'. Maybe
I'm missing something but why did you split your fb driver into
cfag12864b.c and cfag12864fb.c ?
BTW, 'cfag12864b_cache' could have been static...
Franck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists