[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061023105022.8b1dc75d.akpm@osdl.org>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 10:50:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, ncunningham@...uxmail.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Freeze bdevs when freezing processes.
> On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 19:14:50 +0200 Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:
> On Mon 2006-10-23 09:55:22, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 16:07:16 +0200 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > > > I'm trying to prepare the patches to make swsusp into suspend2.
> > >
> > > Oh, I see. Please don't do that.
> >
> > Why not?
>
> Last time I checked, suspend2 was 15000 lines of code, including its
> own plugin system and special user-kernel protocol for drawing
> progress bar (netlink based). It also did parts of user interface from
That's different.
I don't know where these patches are leading, but thus far they look like
reasonable cleanups and generalisations. So I suggest we just take them
one at a time.
>
> OTOH, that was half a year ago, but given that uswsusp can now do most
> of the stuff suspend2 does (and without that 15000 lines of code), I
> do not think we want to do complete rewrite of swsusp now.
uswsusp seems like a bad idea to me. We'd be better off concentrating on a
simple, clean in-kernel thing which *works*. Right now the main problems
with swsusp are that it's slow and that there are driver problems.
(Actually these are both driver problems).
Fiddling with the top-level interfaces doesn't address either of these core
problems.
Apparently uswsusp has gained support for S3 while the in-kernel driver
does not support S3. That's disappointing.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists