linux-kernel - Re: Removing MAX_ARG_PAGES (request for comments/assistance)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <65dd6fd50610241147i70c978daueba7acf229fa5f23@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 24 Oct 2006 11:47:14 -0700
From:	"Ollie Wild" <aaw@...gle.com>
To:	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Removing MAX_ARG_PAGES (request for comments/assistance)

> I'll have another look tomorrow, but I too don't have access to a funny
> platform, so I can be of limited help implementing the missing stack
> model. - that was all that is missing, right?
>
> Peter

That's the main technical item.  I guess I was hoping for some more
general feedback regarding the desirability of this patch: "Yes, this
is good.  Polish it off and we'll incorporate it," "No, we think the
status quo is fine," or something along those lines.

There is one point I forgot to mention.  I'm not sure what to do with
the audit_bprm() function.  It tries to copy the entire argument array
into a kmalloc'ed region, which isn't gonig to fly if we allow the
argument list to grow arbitrarily large.

Ollie
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/