[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0610241313310.8933@attu4.cs.washington.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 13:18:04 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...washington.edu>
To: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...l.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...ectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] appletalk: prevent unregister_sysctl_table() with a NULL
argument
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Akinobu Mita wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 02:38:24AM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
>
> > The only way this would happen at atalk_unregister_sysctl is if the
> > kmalloc failed on register_sysctl_table during init. In that case there
> > is no need to unregister atalk in the first place since it never came up,
>
> Yes. this patch doesn't cause failure if sysctl registration failed.
> It aims to avoid that minor possible NULL pointer dereference.
>
That dereference should never be possible. If sysctl registration fails,
it should not be left partially initialized so that it would ever need to
be cleaned up later; it should just fail to register. So the fix, if
indeed one is required in this instance that you have witnessed, should be
an immediate response to an -ENOMEM on register_sysctl_table. Adding this
to atalk_unregister_sysctl is incorrect because that function should only
be entered given the condition that the register was successful, which in
this case it was not.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists