[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1161668623.10524.579.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 15:43:42 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Shem Multinymous <multinymous@...il.com>,
David Zeuthen <davidz@...hat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, olpc-dev@...top.org, greg@...ah.com,
len.brown@...el.com, sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: Battery class driver.
On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 04:53 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2006 at 01:48:27PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2006-10-24 at 04:27 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>
> > > Reading the battery status has the potential to call an SMI that might
> > > take an arbitrary period of time to return, and we found that having
> > > querying at around the 1 second mark tended to result in noticable
> > > system performace degredation.
>
> > I think it's up to the backend to poll more slowly and cache the results
> > on those machines then.
>
> The kernel backend or the userspace backend? We need to decide on
> terminology :)
The kernel. Userspace don't have to know the details of how hard it is
for the backend to fetch the data imho.
> There's no good programmatic way of determining how long
> a query will take other than doing it and looking at the result. I guess
> we could do that at boot time.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists