linux-kernel - Re: More uml build failures on 2.16.19-rc3 and 2.6.18.1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061025154130.GF4323@ccure.user-mode-linux.org>
Date:	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 11:41:30 -0400
From:	Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>
To:	Mitch <Mitch@...ts.COM>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: More uml build failures on 2.16.19-rc3 and 2.6.18.1

On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 01:00:55AM +0400, Mitch wrote:
> I've definetly not done any such change on my machine. Remember with the 
> same compile, same environment, if i go back to 2.6.18 i can build uml 
> fine. If i move to 2.6.18.1 or above it breaks...

You're sure about that?  I just looked through the 2.6.18.1 changelog and
I see nothing that would cause this.

> I do notice my gcc stddef does have this defined
> 
> % grep offsetof /usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux/4.0.3/include/stddef.h
> #define offsetof(TYPE, MEMBER) __builtin_offsetof (TYPE, MEMBER)

I would do a -E build and make sure that this header, or another one that
defines offsetof is getting pulled in.

				Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/