| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <453FABF5.6080209@superbug.co.uk> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 19:24:53 +0100 From: James Courtier-Dutton <James@...erbug.co.uk> To: Lehner franz <hamtitampti@...il.com> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: Network: Duplicate MAC adress response in multihomed system : All Kernels Lehner franz wrote: > Maybe it is a setting, i have searched everywhere, but this is really > mysterious > > take a linux, configure this kind > > eth0: 192.168.10.200 / 255.255.255.0 > eth1: 192.168.10.201 / 255.255.255.0 > > Both Interfaces are "real ethernet cards" and are connected to same switch > > if you take now a 3'rd machine, and do a > > arping -c 1 192.168.10.200 >> 60 bytes from 00:0c:29:bc:96:fe ( 192.168.10.200): index=0 >> time=645.876 usec >> 60 bytes from 00:0c:29:bc:96:f4 ( 192.168.10.200): index=1 time=1.472 >> msec > > arping -c 1 192.168.10.201 >> 60 bytes from 00:0c:29:bc:96:fe (192.168.10.201 ): index=0 >> time=833.988 usec >> 60 bytes from 00:0c:29:bc:96:f4 (192.168.10.201): index=1 time=1.211 msec > This behavior is correct. You should not set up a network in the way you have. Look at "bonding" for a better way to set up a system with multiple physical interfaces on the same subnetwork. James - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists