linux-kernel - Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1161816884.7615.28.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Wed, 25 Oct 2006 23:54:44 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	Pavel Roskin <proski@....org>
Cc:	David Weinehall <tao@....umu.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

Ar Mer, 2006-10-25 am 18:02 -0400, ysgrifennodd Pavel Roskin:
> And that's what I think is way over the top.  It's akin looking for
> process called "wine" (or detecting it by its behavior) and denying it
> access to some syscalls.

On the contrary there is little likelyhood that wine is a derivative
work, and even if it was the note with the kernel explicitly deals with
that by saying "we don't intend a judge to interpret it that way"


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/