[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <37995C30-BB76-417A-B499-DC0DA6418139@kernel.crashing.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 00:41:31 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...nel.crashing.org>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linuxppc-dev list <linuxppc-dev@...abs.org>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org mailing list"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IPIC: Don't call set_irq_handler with desc->lock held.
On Oct 23, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Scott Wood wrote:
> This patch causes ipic_set_irq_type to set the handler directly rather
> than call set_irq_handler, which causes spinlock recursion because
> the lock is already held when ipic_set_irq_type is called.
>
> I'm also not convinced that ipic_set_irq_type should be changing the
> handler at all. There seem to be several controllers that don't and
> several that do. Those that do would break what appears to be a
> common
> usage of calling set_irq_chip_and_handler followed by set_irq_type,
> if a
> non-standard handler were to be used. OTOH, irq_create_of_mapping()
> doesn't set the handler, but only calls set_irq_type().
>
> This patch gets things working in the spinlock-debugging-enabled case,
> but I'm curious as to where the handler setting is ideally supposed
> to be
> done. I don't see any documentation on set_irq_type() that clarifies
> what the semantics are supposed to be.
Guys, Scott pointed this problem out on a PPC interrupt controller,
and wanted to raise it in a larger forum since it appears to exist on
at least one ARM interrupt controller I looked at (ixp4xx). What is
the proper solution to handle this.
The callers of set_type() I found all grab desc->lock.
- kumar
>
> Signed-off-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
> index bc4d4a7..746f78c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/ipic.c
> @@ -473,9 +473,9 @@ static int ipic_set_irq_type(unsigned in
> desc->status |= flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_SENSE_MASK;
> if (flow_type & IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW) {
> desc->status |= IRQ_LEVEL;
> - set_irq_handler(virq, handle_level_irq);
> + desc->handle_irq = handle_level_irq;
> } else {
> - set_irq_handler(virq, handle_edge_irq);
> + desc->handle_irq = handle_edge_irq;
> }
>
> /* only EXT IRQ senses are programmable on ipic
> --
> 1.4.2.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@...abs.org
> https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists