[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440610242301te23d733g9d73402303c76135@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 23:01:24 -0700
From: yhlu <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...washington.edu>
Cc: "Andi Kleen" <ak@....de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
"Muli Ben-Yehuda" <muli@...ibm.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64 irq: reset more to default when clear irq_vector for destroy_irq
I cut the code paste the lines from __assign_irq_vector().
It seems we need to change
if (old_vector >= 0) {
in __assign_irq_vector with this one to
if (old_vector > 0) {
later. Eric?
YH
> The two conditionals don't complement each other; in fact, only one
> conditional is required since the test for old_vector equality to zero
> will never be satisfied. Also note that irq_vectors are u8 on x86_64 and
> not ints.
>
> static void __clear_irq_vector(int irq)
> {
> u8 old_vector = irq_vector[irq];
> if (old_vector > 0) {
> cpumask_t old_mask;
> int old_cpu;
> cpus_and(old_mask, irq_domain[irq], cpu_online_map);
> for_each_cpu_mask(old_cpu, old_mask)
> per_cpu(vector_irq, old_cpu)[old_vector] = -1;
> }
> irq_vector[irq] = 0;
> irq_domain[irq] = CPU_MASK_NONE;
> }
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists