[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061025084226.GN5851@elf.ucw.cz>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2006 10:42:26 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...uxmail.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use extents for recording what swap is allocated.
Hi!
> > > With the code I have in Suspend2 (which is what I'm working towards),
> > > the value includes the swap_type, so there's no overlap. Assuming the
> > > swap allocator does it's normal thing and swap allocated is contiguous,
> > > you'll probably end up with two extents: one containing the swap
> > > allocated on the first device, and the other containing the swap
> > > allocated on the second device. So (with the current version), striping
> > > would use 6 * sizeof(unsigned long) instead of 3 * sizeof(unsigned
> > > long).
> >
> > And now, can you do same computation assuming the swap allocator goes
> > completely crazy, and free space is in 1-page chunks?
>
> The worst case is 3 * sizeof(unsigned long) *
> number_of_swap_extents_allocated bytes.
Okay, so if we got 4GB of swap space, thats 1MB swap pages, worst case
is you have one extent per page, on x86-64 that's 24MB. +kmalloc
overhead, I assume?
And you do linear walks over those extents, leading to O(n^2)
algorithm, no? That has bitten us before...
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists