[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1161863541.12781.32.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 12:52:21 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Jan Dittmer <jdi@....org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, sds@...ho.nsa.gov,
jmorris@...ei.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org, selinux@...ho.nsa.gov,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, aviro@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Security issues with local filesystem caching
Ar Iau, 2006-10-26 am 11:14 +0200, ysgrifennodd Jan Dittmer:
> Why again no local userspace daemon to do the caching? That would
> put the policy out of the kernel. The additional context switches
> are probably pretty cheap compared to the io operations.
It costs a lot in latency, and you don't need a daemon in the first
place. If you want to do a user space caching fs of course you can
already do it with FUSE..
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists