linux-kernel - Re: [Q] missing unused dentry in prune

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20675.1161871652@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 26 Oct 2006 15:07:32 +0100
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Vasily Averin <vvs@...ru>
Cc:	aviro@...hat.com, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
	Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>, Olaf Hering <olh@...e.de>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
	Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devel@...nvz.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [Q] missing unused dentry in prune_dcache()? 

Vasily Averin <vvs@...ru> wrote:

> I would note that in first two hunks you have decremented
> dentry_stat.nr_unused correctly, under dcache_lock. Probably it's better to
> count freed dentries only in third case and corrects dentry_stat.nr_unused
> value inside shrink_dcache_for_umount_subtree() function before return.

Maybe, maybe not.  This way we only touch the dentry_stat cacheline once, if
at all.  I'm not sure it'd make much difference though.

David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/