linux-kernel - Re: Another kernel releated GPL ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610260924.16767.vlobanov@speakeasy.net>
Date:	Thu, 26 Oct 2006 09:24:16 -0700
From:	Vadim Lobanov <vlobanov@...akeasy.net>
To:	markh@...pro.net
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Erik Mouw <erik@...ddisk-recovery.com>, dmarkh@....rr.com,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Another kernel releated GPL ?

On Thursday 26 October 2006 08:02, Mark Hounschell wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> > In the usual case it doesn't matter, much stuff is GPL anyway, and for
> > the usual system calls/C library stuff not only is the law probably
> > fairly well established but there is an explicit statement with the
> > kernel that we don't want to claim such rights for a normal system call
> > which would guide a Judge if a case ever came up.
>
> That's sort of what I was in search of. Where is this "explicit statement"
> found BTW.

COPYING file in top-level directory.

> Thanks
> Mark

-- Vadim Lobanov
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/