[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1161854342.5299.30.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 19:19:02 +1000
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
cbe-oss-dev@...abs.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH 12/16] cell: add temperature to SPU and
CPU sysfs entries
On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 09:35 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 26 October 2006 01:19, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > >
> > > Will crash if cpu_add_sysdev_attr_group failed...
> >
> >
> > Which is a total PITA. If this is the case, then we should modify the
> > add calls to at least initialize enough fields before they can fail for
> > the remove calls not to crash. You don't want to keep track precisely of
> > what file was added and what not and test all of that in your exit code
> > path, it's just insane.
>
> Heiko suggested that earlied in http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/10/9/22,
> but Andrew didn't like it.
>
> Currently, the worst is that sysfs_remove_file can be used
> on a nonexisting file, but sysfs_remove_group cannot, which is
> inconsistent. Either sysfs_remove_file should WARN_ON or
> sysfs_remove_group should silently return, and I'd prefer the
> latter, as it makes users simpler.
We need to argue with Andrew then. I'll have a go tomorrow
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists