[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061027123111.GA2898@ff.dom.local>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 14:31:11 +0200
From: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...pl>
To: John M Flinchbaugh <john@...oft.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: inconsistent lock state in 2.6.18.1
On 25-10-2006 13:00, John M Flinchbaugh wrote:
> I see this OOPS on boot with 2.6.18.1/amd64:
You mean this INFO?
> [ 113.147347] =================================
> [ 113.147561] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
> [ 113.147668] ---------------------------------
> [ 113.147775] inconsistent {in-hardirq-W} -> {hardirq-on-W} usage.
> [ 113.147883] dhclient3/1787 [HC0[0]:SC0[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
> [ 113.147991] (&ei_local->page_lock){+...}, at: [<ffffffff88080fbb>] ei_start_xmit+0x95/0x24e [8390]
> [ 113.148274] {in-hardirq-W} state was registered at:
> [ 113.148382] [<ffffffff802443d5>] lock_acquire+0x7a/0xa1
> [ 113.148556] [<ffffffff80438c09>] _spin_lock+0x2e/0x3c
> [ 113.148730] [<ffffffff880808e0>] ei_interrupt+0x44/0x2fb [8390]
It looks there is a patch for this in 2.6.19-rc (8390.c).
Jarek P.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists