linux-kernel - Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20061027081413.04df9f7f@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 27 Oct 2006 08:14:13 -0700
From:	Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Gianluca Alberici <gianluca@...networks.biz>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper

On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 16:24:58 +0200
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org> wrote:

> > >
> > i've found:
> > 
> > __create_workqueue
> > queue_work
> 
> 
> if you change the queue_work() calls to schedule_work() (and drop it's
> first argument) and just remove the create_workqueue() entirely, does it
> work then? (probably also need to remove destroy_workqueue() call)
> if so, that's the real solution on the ndiswrapper side...
> 
> 

Or maybe do equivalent delayed function calls by using a kthread.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/