lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 27 Oct 2006 18:54:10 +0300
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, vovan888@...il.com
Subject: Re: Protocol for merging -omap changes

Hi,

* Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> [061027 15:43]:
> Hi!
> 
> I see that linux-omap still has pretty big difference from
> linux-arm... are there any plans at merging them? Is there some way I
> could help?

Yeah, let's get more of the commonly used omap drivers merged!
 
> I have bunch of siemens sx1 changes from Vladimir here, and some of
> them seem ready to merge... should they be merged with Tony? Or
> directly with rmk bringing stuff from -omap tree as needed?

Core omap stuff goes first to linux-omap tree, and then gets merged
to mainline kernel through RMK. Drivers should go through the
appropriate driver maintainers or LKML.

So please split your patches accordingly. All arch/arm/*omap* and
include/asm-arm/arch-omap patches should be separate from drivers.

Regards,

Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ