[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061027114729.49185fd2@freekitty>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:47:29 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [patch] drivers: wait for threaded probes between initcall
levels
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:42:37 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org> wrote:
> From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
>
> The multithreaded-probing code has a problem: after one initcall level (eg,
> core_initcall) has been processed, we will then start processing the next
> level (postcore_initcall) while the kernel threads which are handling
> core_initcall are still executing. This breaks the guarantees which the
> layered initcalls previously gave us.
>
> IOW, we want to be multithreaded _within_ an initcall level, but not between
> different levels.
>
> Fix that up by causing the probing code to wait for all outstanding probes at
> one level to complete before we start processing the next level.
>
> Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
> ---
>
This looks like a good place to use a counting semaphore.
--
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists