[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0610262027350.12347@attu2.cs.washington.edu>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 20:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...washington.edu>
To: Martin Tostrup Setek <martitse@...dent.matnat.uio.no>
cc: nagar@...son.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH: 2.6.18.1] delayacct: cpu_count in taskstats updated
correctly
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Martin Tostrup Setek wrote:
> from: Martin T. Setek <martitse@....uio.no>
>
> cpu_count in struct taskstats should be the same as the corresponding (third)
> value found in /proc/<pid>/schedstat
I disagree in favor of Documentation/accounting/taskstats-struct.txt.
cpu_count is the number of delay values recorded, so accumulating them is
appropriate.
David
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists