[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0610271347320.3849@g5.osdl.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 13:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [patch] drivers: wait for threaded probes between initcall levels
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> static int do_in_parallel(void *arg)
> {
> struct thread_exec *p = arg;
> int (*fn)(void *) = p->fn;
> void *arg = p->arg;
> int retval;
>
> /* Tell the caller we are done with the arguments */
> complete(&p->completion);
>
> /* Do the actual work in parallel */
> retval = p->fn(p->arg);
Duh. The whole reason I copied them was to _not_ do that. That last line
should obviously be
retval = fn(arg);
because "p" may gone after we've done the "complete()".
> (And I repeat: the above code is untested, and was written in the email
> client. It has never seen a compiler, and not gotten a _whole_ lot of
> thinking).
.. This hasn't changed, I just looked through the code once and found that
obvious bug.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists