[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45427AFB.8070806@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 17:32:43 -0400
From: Florin Malita <fmalita@...il.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
CC: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, proski@....org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, cate@...ian.org,
gianluca@...networks.biz, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ??] Re: incorrect taint of ndiswrapper
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> (it's a separate question if ndiswrapper should be in this table;
> driverloader should be, it's non-GPL at all, so that part of your patch
> is broken)
>
If driverloader is not GPLed then why does it need to be treated
exceptionally to begin with? It taints the kernel anyway because of its
license.
---
fm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists