lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061027153854.b44c4ecb.akpm@osdl.org>
Date:	Fri, 27 Oct 2006 15:38:54 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...l.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...l.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz
Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6.19 patch] let PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE depend on BROKEN

On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 00:23:26 +0200
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...sta.de> wrote:

> ...
> > So no, this should not be marked BROKEN.
> > 
> > It's a very experimental feature, as the help text says.  If you can
> > think of any harsher language to put in that text, please let me know.
> 
> The problem is that if only 1 out of 100 people who are compiling a 
> kernel accidentally enable this option, linux-kernel will be swamped 
> with bug reports...
> 

Yes, that's a legitimate practical concern, IMO.

I guess many of the people who test -rc kernels have sufficient familarity
to know to disable this option, but a lot of the people who test major
releases do not.  So how about we mark PCI_MULTITHREAD_PROBE as broken in
2.6.19-rc6, then revert that change in 2.6.20-rc1, and keep doing that
until the feature is ready?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ