[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4541A325.6030102@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2006 23:11:49 -0700
From: Om Narasimhan <om.turyx@...il.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@....de>
CC: "Pallipadi, Venkatesh" <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
clemens@...isch.de, vojtech@...e.cz, bob.picco@...com
Subject: Re: HPET : Legacy Routing Replacement Enable - 3rd try.
Andi Kleen wrote:
>> 1. HW is LRR capable, HPET ACPI it is 1, timer interrupt is on INT2.
>> Before the fix: Linux cannot get timer interrupts on INT0, goes for ACPI
>> timer.
>
> What ACPI timer? I don't think we have any fallback for int 0.
Sorry, Mea Culpa, I should have written APIC timer.
>
> Not sure what you mean with INT2. Pin2 on ioapic 0 perhaps?
Yes. PIN2 on IOAPIC #0.
>
>> After the fix : Works fine. This is according to hpet spec.
>
> On what exact motherboard was that?
SunFire X4600
>
>> To handle case 3, I removed all references to acpi_hpet_lrr, explained
>> this case in the code and decided to solely rely on the command line
>> parameter for LRR capability. Rational for this approach is ,
>
> This means the systems which you said fixes this would need the command
> line parameter to work?
I feel I do not make things clear enough.
The command line parameter can be avoided entirely if majority of the BIOSes implement LRR routing correctly. I would rewrite the patch to avoid cmdline parameter and according to Andrew Morton's suggestions.
Thanks,
Om.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists