linux-kernel - Re: Incorrect order of last two arguments of ptrace for requests PPC_PTRACE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	supriyak@...ibm.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Incorrect order of last two arguments of ptrace for requests
 PPC_PTRACE_GETREGS, SETREGS, GETFPREGS, SETFPREGS

From: supriya kannery <supriyak@...ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 12:50:29 +0530

>     I checked in gdb and ltrace code. None of them are using PPC_PTRACE* 
> options to get register values.
> Man page also doesn't mention these options. Once this is fixed, these 
> options could be added to man page also.
> 
> Irrespective of whether we fix this, documentation of these options in 
> manpage will clarify its usage I guess.

Yep.  Are the no current users at all?  That's strange...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/