[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20061028024117.10809.74875.sendpatchset@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2006 19:41:17 -0700 (PDT)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: akpm@...l.org
Cc: Peter Williams <pwil3058@...pond.net.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Siddha, Suresh B" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Avoid taking rq lock in wake_priority_sleeper
Avoid taking the rq lock in wake_priority sleeper
Avoid taking the request queue lock in wake_priority_sleeper if
there are no running processes.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Index: linux-2.6.19-rc3/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.19-rc3.orig/kernel/sched.c 2006-10-26 21:30:11.328325096 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.19-rc3/kernel/sched.c 2006-10-27 11:58:02.142767971 -0500
@@ -2898,6 +2898,9 @@ static inline int wake_priority_sleeper(
int ret = 0;
#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+ if (!rq->nr_running)
+ return 0;
+
spin_lock(&rq->lock);
/*
* If an SMT sibling task has been put to sleep for priority
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists