[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061028114908.GA16631@infradead.org>
Date: Sat, 28 Oct 2006 12:49:08 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Alex Davis <alex14641@...oo.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: most linux friendly motherboard chipset
On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 04:32:23PM -0700, Alex Davis wrote:
> I'm preparing to build a brand new 64-bit machine, I am currently leaning toward AMD 64x2.
> I've read that NVidia, along with (silent) data corruption issues, can be a bit of a pain
> to get working under Linux. Anyone have any experience with ULi, ATI, or SiS?
>
> Note: I'm not entirely ruling out Intel.
If you don't want builtin graphics and prefer AMD Nvidia seems to be a fair
choice.
If you however want builtin-in graphics there absolutely no way around
intel. In fact if you want to do anything graphics-related with Linux
and intel graphics (which only comes built-in) is the only sane choice.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists