linux-kernel - Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 00/11] UBD driver little cleanups for 2.6.19

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610292123.43606.blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
Date:	Sun, 29 Oct 2006 21:23:43 +0100
From:	Blaisorblade <blaisorblade@...oo.it>
To:	user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Jeff Dike <jdike@...toit.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [uml-devel] [PATCH 00/11] UBD driver little cleanups for 2.6.19

On Sunday 29 October 2006 21:02, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2006 20:17:23 +0100
>
> "Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso" <blaisorblade@...oo.it> wrote:
> > Many cleanups for the UBD driver; these are mostly microfixes, I was
> > waiting to finish and reorder also locking fixes (the code works, it is
> > only to resplit, reproof-read and changelogs must be written) but I
> > decided to send these ones for now. The rest will maybe be merged for
> > 2.6.20.

> None of this really looks like -rc3 material.  Why do you think it's
> serious enough to justify late inclusion?

> I'm not particularly fussed about UBD though - if you and Jeff particularly
> want this lot in 2.6.19 then the world won't end.

If Jeff is worried about these patches destabilizing UML you can held them out 
for now (but keep in -mm for 2.6.20), that's absolutely fine for me; however 
there are a few real bug fixes for error paths and IMHO they are safe enough 
to merge.

> "[PATCH 03/11] uml ubd driver: var renames" didn't apply due to
> dummy_device_release not being present, which doesn't inspire confidence.
> What tree are you patching?
It's just git HEAD, but earlier little patches cause that conflict. 
I am sure that the obvious fixup is correct.

I just gave a look to that hunk in the addition log and it looks ok.
-- 
Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!".
Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade
http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade
Chiacchiera con i tuoi amici in tempo reale! 
 http://it.yahoo.com/mail_it/foot/*http://it.messenger.yahoo.com 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/