[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20061029232819.GA11687@osiris.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:28:19 +0100
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] sys_pselect7 vs compat_sys_pselect7 uaccess error handling
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
758333458aa719bfc26ec16eafd4ad3a9e96014d fixes the not checked copy_to_user
return value of compat_sys_pselect7. I ran into this too because of an old
source tree, but my fix would look quite a bit different to Andi's fix.
The reason is that the compat function IMHO should behave the very same as
the non-compat function if possible. Since sys_pselect7 does not return
-EFAULT in this specific case, change the compat code so it behaves like
sys_pselect7.
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
---
fs/compat.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/compat.c b/fs/compat.c
index 50624d4..8d0a001 100644
--- a/fs/compat.c
+++ b/fs/compat.c
@@ -1835,9 +1835,12 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_pselect7(int
} while (!ret && !timeout && tsp && (ts.tv_sec || ts.tv_nsec));
- if (ret == 0 && tsp && !(current->personality & STICKY_TIMEOUTS)) {
+ if (tsp) {
struct compat_timespec rts;
+ if (current->personality & STICKY_TIMEOUTS)
+ goto sticky;
+
rts.tv_sec = timeout / HZ;
rts.tv_nsec = (timeout % HZ) * (NSEC_PER_SEC/HZ);
if (rts.tv_nsec >= NSEC_PER_SEC) {
@@ -1846,8 +1849,19 @@ asmlinkage long compat_sys_pselect7(int
}
if (compat_timespec_compare(&rts, &ts) >= 0)
rts = ts;
- if (copy_to_user(tsp, &rts, sizeof(rts)))
- ret = -EFAULT;
+ if (copy_to_user(tsp, &rts, sizeof(rts))) {
+sticky:
+ /*
+ * If an application puts its timeval in read-only
+ * memory, we don't want the Linux-specific update to
+ * the timeval to cause a fault after the select has
+ * completed successfully. However, because we're not
+ * updating the timeval, we can't restart the system
+ * call.
+ */
+ if (ret == -ERESTARTNOHAND)
+ ret = -EINTR;
+ }
}
if (ret == -ERESTARTNOHAND) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists