[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4544714F.7070203@qumranet.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2006 11:15:59 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...ranet.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ibm.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, kvm-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH 6/13] KVM: memory slot management
Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>
>> It's not about tlb entries. The shadow page tables collaples a GV ->
>> HV -> HP double translation into a GV -> HP page table. When the
>> Linux vm goes around evicting pages, it invalidates those mappings.
>>
>> There are two solutions possible: lock pages which participate in
>> these translations (and their number can be large) or modify the
>> Linux vm to consult a reverse mapping and remove the translations (in
>> which case TLB entries need to be removed).
>>
>
> If you locked pages that have active shadow mappings, you could then
> use a secondary mechanism to invalidate existing mappings when necessary.
>
Yes.
There are two needs: to propagate virtual machine activity to the host
(by folding dirty and accessed bits from multiple shadow ptes into a
single struct page), and to apply pressure from the vm to the guest (by
invalidating all mappings of a given page).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists