linux-kernel - Re: why "probe_kernel_address()", not "probe_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200610291402.33890.vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Date:	Sun, 29 Oct 2006 14:02:33 +0100
From:	Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To:	Luca Tettamanti <kronos.it@...il.com>
Cc:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...dspring.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: why "probe_kernel_address()", not "probe_user_address()"?

On Saturday 28 October 2006 22:30, Luca Tettamanti wrote:
> probe_kernel_address wrapper is used to "hide" the fact that we are
> re-using the infrastructure provided by a function with a confusing name
> ;) The cast to __user is needed to keep sparse quiet.

Shouldn't the above text be placed in a comment above probe_kernel_address()
definition? ;)
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/