[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <45459B92.400@sw.ru>
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:28:34 +0300
From: Kirill Korotaev <dev@...ru>
To: devel@...nvz.org
CC: Vasily Averin <vvs@...ru>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>,
Kirill Korotaev <dev@...nvz.org>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Balbir Singh <balbir@...ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Olaf Hering <olh@...e.de>,
Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Devel] Re: [PATCH 2.6.19-rc3] VFS: per-sb dentry lru list
David,
>>The proposed fix prevents this issue by using per-sb dentry LRU list. It
>>provides very quickly search for the unused dentries for given super block thus
>>forcing shrinking always making good progress.
>
>
> We've been down this path before:
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=114861109717260&w=2
>
> A lot of comments on per-sb unused dentry lists were made in
> the threads associated with the above. other solutions were
> found to the problem that the above patch addressed, but I don't
> think any of them have made it to mainline yet. You might want
> to have a bit of a read of these threads first...
The major difference between our patch and the one discussed in the link
it that we keep both global and per-sb dentry LRU lists.
Thus, when needed normal LRU is used and prune logic is unchanged,
while umount/remount use per-sb list and do its job faster.
Thanks,
Kirill
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists