linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] handle ext3 directory corruption better

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4547512E.8010603@cfl.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:35:42 -0500
From:	Phillip Susi <psusi@....rr.com>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC:	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] handle ext3 directory corruption better

Another expectation is that after the fsck, you won't loose any more 
data that you could access by mounting the damaged filesystem.  There 
are a lot of horror stories out there of people only having a slightly 
damaged fs, and after a fsck, they lost a lot more data.

Pavel Machek wrote:
> 
> Nice... can you run the same tool against fsck, too?
> 
> I did that some time ago, with less evil tool, and got some
> interesting results.
> 
> (Expectation is that no matter how you corrupt fs, fsck will get it
> back to consistent state...)
> 						Pavel

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/