linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0942db0610310834i6244c0abm10c81e984565ed8a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:34:23 -0800
From:	"Ray Lee" <madrabbit@...il.com>
To:	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@...gle.com>
Cc:	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@...l.org>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.19-rc4

On 10/31/06, Martin J. Bligh <mbligh@...gle.com> wrote:
> > At some point we should get rid of all the "politeness" warnings, just
> > because they can end up hiding the _real_ ones.
>
> Yay! Couldn't agree more. Does this mean you'll take patches for all the
> uninitialized variable crap from gcc 4.x ?

What would be useful in the short term is a tool that shows only the
new warnings that didn't exist in the last point release.

Ray
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/