[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9a8748490610310840w28d44a88xd1db60b155c03f52@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 17:40:21 +0100
From: "Jesper Juhl" <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
To: "Andreas Gruenbacher" <agruen@...e.de>
Cc: "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...washington.edu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Neil Brown" <neilb@....unsw.edu.au>,
nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...l.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NFS: nfsaclsvc_encode_getaclres() - Fix potential NULL deref and tiny optimization.
On 31/10/06, Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@...e.de> wrote:
> On Saturday 28 October 2006 00:01, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > > > 3) There are two locations in the function where we may return before
> > > > we use the value of the variable 'w', but we compute it at the very top
> > > > of the function. So in the case where we return early we have wasted a
> > > > few cycles computing a value that was never used.
>
> Computing w later in the function is fine.
>
> > > w should be an unsigned int.
> >
> > Makes sense.
>
> No, this breaks the while loop further below: with an unsigned int, the loop
> counter underflows and wraps.
>
Whoops. OK.
> Please fix this identically in fs/nfsd/nfs2acl.c and fs/nfsd/nfs3acl.c.
>
Sure thing, expect patches later this evening.
BTW: I posted an add-on patch on top of my first one - apart from the
"make w unsigned" bit, is the rest of that OK?
--
Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@...il.com>
Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html
Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists